THURSDAY (12-FEB-26)

Pair 2 - BRONWYN CHISHOLM / PETER DANIEL
Place: 5, Percentage: 55.56%

Board No	vs Pr	Contract	Lead	Result	Score	Matchpoints	%
Board 1	5: WENDY DODD / JANE PILGRAM	4 E	QD	9	-50	2	25%
Board 2	5: WENDY DODD / JANE PILGRAM	6 N	AD	10	200	5	62%
Board 3	5: WENDY DODD / JANE PILGRAM	2 W	TD	11	200	8	100%
Board 4	12: CORA BROWN / SUZANNE DEWAR	3NT W	5H	10	630	6	75%
Board 5	12: CORA BROWN / SUZANNE DEWAR	4 S	3H	11	-650	3	38%
Board 6	12: CORA BROWN / SUZANNE DEWAR	4 S	TC	11	-450	0	0%
Board 7	9: WESLEY NANNETTE HUBER / KAY HYDE	3 N	5H	9	110	8	100%
Board 8	9: WESLEY NANNETTE HUBER / KAY HYDE	2NT S	QS	9	150	8	100%
Board 9	9: WESLEY NANNETTE HUBER / KAY HYDE	2NT W	AD	5	300	8	100%
Board 10	7: GERRY EMMONS / ANDREA EMMONS	1NT S	QC	6	-100	3	38%
Board 11	7: GERRY EMMONS / ANDREA EMMONS	6 W	4C	12	-980	0	0%
Board 12	7: GERRY EMMONS / ANDREA EMMONS	3 E	AC	6	150	7	88%
Board 13	4: DELYS SYME / MARY ANNETTE ROBERTS	3 W	AS	7	-200	0	0%
Board 14	4: DELYS SYME / MARY ANNETTE ROBERTS	4 E	6S	8	-100	8	100%
Board 15	4: DELYS SYME / MARY ANNETTE ROBERTS	2 E	AS	7	-50	4	50%
Board 16	10: MARI MCKIE / SUSAN ANNE LEWIS	2NT S	QH	10	-180	7	88%
Board 17	10: MARI MCKIE / SUSAN ANNE LEWIS	4 E	5H	8	-100	7	88%
Board 18	10: MARI MCKIE / SUSAN ANNE LEWIS	2 S	8H	9	-140	1	12%
Board 19	8: PHANTOM / TOSH TIELEMAN	4NT S	2C	9	-50	2	25%
Board 20	8: PHANTOM / TOSH TIELEMAN	4 E	4D	10	-620	3	38%
Board 21	8: PHANTOM / TOSH TIELEMAN	2 E	AS	8	-110	0	0%
Board 22	6: COLLENE BUREK / KATHRYN THOMAS	4 E	AC	10	620	6	75%
Board 23	6: COLLENE BUREK / KATHRYN THOMAS	PASS N		=	0	7	88%
Board 24	6: COLLENE BUREK / KATHRYN THOMAS	2 S	QS	5	150	6	75%
Board 25	11: DAVID HIATT / DENNIS MCKINLEY	3 N	AS	10	-130	3	38%
Board 26	11: DAVID HIATT / DENNIS MCKINLEY	2NT E	7H	6	-200	0	0%
Board 27	11: DAVID HIATT / DENNIS MCKINLEY	3NT W	7C	9	400	8	100%

Click on the Board Number to display that complete board, or click on a Pair to show that Pair's performance.