THURSDAY (23-MAY-24)

Pair 2 - ZITA CARUANA / DENNIS MCKINLEY
Place: 5, Percentage: 42%

Board No	vs Pr	Contract	Lead	Result	Score	Matchpoints	%
Board 1	4: KATE SAYER / TOSH TIELEMAN	3 E	5C	6	150	4	100%
Board 2	4: KATE SAYER / TOSH TIELEMAN	3 W	7H	13	-190	0	0%
Board 3	4: KATE SAYER / TOSH TIELEMAN	1 N	2D	4	-150	2	50%
Board 4	4: KATE SAYER / TOSH TIELEMAN	4 S	7H	8	-200	0	0%
Board 5	4: KATE SAYER / TOSH TIELEMAN	4 E	3D	7	150	4	100%
Board 6	6: SHAR SNOW / GEORGE SNOW	2 S	5C	5	150	2	50%
Board 7	6: SHAR SNOW / GEORGE SNOW	1 E	6C	5	-200	0	0%
Board 8	6: SHAR SNOW / GEORGE SNOW	4 N	QC	9	50	4	100%
Board 9	6: SHAR SNOW / GEORGE SNOW	4 W	JC	11	650	2	50%
Board 10	6: SHAR SNOW / GEORGE SNOW	2 E	4D	9	140	2	50%
Board 11	1: DI VAN SANTEN / PETER DANIEL	2 N	9H	9	-110	4	100%
Board 12	1: DI VAN SANTEN / PETER DANIEL	4 W	JS	10	130	0	0%
Board 13	1: DI VAN SANTEN / PETER DANIEL	3NT N	2H	8	100	3	75%
Board 14	1: DI VAN SANTEN / PETER DANIEL	2NT W	9S	7	-50	0	0%
Board 15	1: DI VAN SANTEN / PETER DANIEL	4 S	5D	8	200	4	100%
Board 16	5: WESLEY NANNETTE HUBER / SUSAN ANNE LEWIS	2 W	9C	9	140	1	25%
Board 17	5: WESLEY NANNETTE HUBER / SUSAN ANNE LEWIS	3 N	2H	10	-130	2	50%
Board 18	5: WESLEY NANNETTE HUBER / SUSAN ANNE LEWIS	3 S	JS	9	-110	0	0%
Board 19	5: WESLEY NANNETTE HUBER / SUSAN ANNE LEWIS	1NT E	6D	8	120	4	100%
Board 20	5: WESLEY NANNETTE HUBER / SUSAN ANNE LEWIS	1 W	AD	9	140	1	25%
Board 21	3: PHANTOM / SHEILA BRADSHAW	2 N	2C	7	-100	0	0%
Board 22	3: PHANTOM / SHEILA BRADSHAW	2NT N	3D	8	120	1	25%
Board 23	3: PHANTOM / SHEILA BRADSHAW	3 E	3D	11	-200	0	0%
Board 24	3: PHANTOM / SHEILA BRADSHAW	3 N	3H	9	110	2	50%
Board 25	3: PHANTOM / SHEILA BRADSHAW	4 W	4C	10	-620	0	0%

Click on the Board Number to display that complete board, or click on a Pair to show that Pair's performance.