THURSDAY (23-MAY-24)

Pair 1 - DI VAN SANTEN / PETER DANIEL
Place: 6, Percentage: 36%

Board No	vs Pr	Contract	Lead	Result	Score	Matchpoints	%
Board 1	6: SHAR SNOW / GEORGE SNOW	3 W	QD	9	110	4	100%
Board 2	6: SHAR SNOW / GEORGE SNOW	3 W	JD	9	110	0	0%
Board 3	6: SHAR SNOW / GEORGE SNOW	4 N	JS	6	200	4	100%
Board 4	6: SHAR SNOW / GEORGE SNOW	2 S	5C	9	-140	2	50%
Board 5	6: SHAR SNOW / GEORGE SNOW	3 N	AH	8	100	3	75%
Board 6	5: WESLEY NANNETTE HUBER / SUSAN ANNE LEWIS	1NT E	8D	7	90	0	0%
Board 7	5: WESLEY NANNETTE HUBER / SUSAN ANNE LEWIS	2 S	AS	8	-90	3	75%
Board 8	5: WESLEY NANNETTE HUBER / SUSAN ANNE LEWIS	3 N	QC	9	-140	2	50%
Board 9	5: WESLEY NANNETTE HUBER / SUSAN ANNE LEWIS	4 W	KH	11	650	2	50%
Board 10	5: WESLEY NANNETTE HUBER / SUSAN ANNE LEWIS	4 E	KH	9	-100	0	0%
Board 11	2: ZITA CARUANA / DENNIS MCKINLEY	2 N	9H	9	110	0	0%
Board 12	2: ZITA CARUANA / DENNIS MCKINLEY	4 W	JS	10	-130	4	100%
Board 13	2: ZITA CARUANA / DENNIS MCKINLEY	3NT N	2H	8	-100	1	25%
Board 14	2: ZITA CARUANA / DENNIS MCKINLEY	2NT W	9S	7	50	4	100%
Board 15	2: ZITA CARUANA / DENNIS MCKINLEY	4 S	5D	8	-200	0	0%
Board 16	3: PHANTOM / SHEILA BRADSHAW	4 W	AH	11	-650	0	0%
Board 17	3: PHANTOM / SHEILA BRADSHAW	3 S	6C	8	-50	0	0%
Board 18	3: PHANTOM / SHEILA BRADSHAW	1NT S	7H	6	-100	0	0%
Board 19	3: PHANTOM / SHEILA BRADSHAW	2NT N	2S	6	-100	2	50%
Board 20	3: PHANTOM / SHEILA BRADSHAW	4 W	QC	10	-620	0	0%
Board 21	4: KATE SAYER / TOSH TIELEMAN	1NT S	2D	8	-120	2	50%
Board 22	4: KATE SAYER / TOSH TIELEMAN	2NT N	2H	8	-120	3	75%
Board 23	4: KATE SAYER / TOSH TIELEMAN	3 S	QS	8	100	0	0%
Board 24	4: KATE SAYER / TOSH TIELEMAN	1NT S	5S	9	-150	0	0%
Board 25	4: KATE SAYER / TOSH TIELEMAN	3 W	4C	9	110	0	0%

Click on the Board Number to display that complete board, or click on a Pair to show that Pair's performance.